Why are Aussie tri boards long, and other ramblings LONG
Moderator: Moderator
- PaulN
- Ripper (more than 100 posts)
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: SLC - soon to be Florida.
What are your guns?Steenos wrote:all my boards between 5"7 and 6"2
except for guns
and I am 6'4
This leads me to another question. I was watching The Sparrow has landed and Friends, and watching Simon's segment at Puerto. It looked like he was riding a longer board, for a wave like that what would the Aussie tri be? Would you lengthen the board for paddle but pull in the width?
SCRUB IT KOOK!!!
- ross
- Legend (Contribution King!)
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 7:38 am
- Location: centralcoast nsw aust
PaulN,
yeah guns do paddle better. But for me personally i choose to use them for the way they ride.
The momentum and ground covered through a turn on a gun being used in the waves it was built for is an awesome feeling.
there is a shot of me at Grajagan a few pages back in the album now, bottom turn,red shirt on. I'm riding a 6'8" on that wave and it didn't feel to long in any way, shape or form.
try one in solid waves, you'll wish you'd done it earlier
Ross
yeah guns do paddle better. But for me personally i choose to use them for the way they ride.
The momentum and ground covered through a turn on a gun being used in the waves it was built for is an awesome feeling.
there is a shot of me at Grajagan a few pages back in the album now, bottom turn,red shirt on. I'm riding a 6'8" on that wave and it didn't feel to long in any way, shape or form.
try one in solid waves, you'll wish you'd done it earlier

Ross
- PaulN
- Ripper (more than 100 posts)
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: SLC - soon to be Florida.
I would like to. I have ridden a 6'4 Flashpoint (semi-gun maybe?) but have not got it into the surf it needs yet.ross wrote:PaulN,
yeah guns do paddle better. But for me personally i choose to use them for the way they ride.
The momentum and ground covered through a turn on a gun being used in the waves it was built for is an awesome feeling.
there is a shot of me at Grajagan a few pages back in the album now, bottom turn,red shirt on. I'm riding a 6'8" on that wave and it didn't feel to long in any way, shape or form.
try one in solid waves, you'll wish you'd done it earlier![]()
Ross
SCRUB IT KOOK!!!
- PaulN
- Ripper (more than 100 posts)
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: SLC - soon to be Florida.
For OBSB? What are you riding now? If you buy the gun will you ride it with fins do you think?SFKneelo wrote:Ross, I'm on board, and itching to get one that length... I think I have enough pennies saved.
Maybe more collectively, I'm pretty much a quad-fin fan... how do boards that length work with a quad set-up?
SCRUB IT KOOK!!!
-
- Local (More than 25 post)
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 3:15 am
- Location: miles from home
I imagine it would be fine, I'm sure someone like Baden Smith rides quads/four fins on boards of that length.SFKneelo wrote:Maybe more collectively, I'm pretty much a quad-fin fan... how do boards that length work with a quad set-up?
my view has always been get a board to suit whatever waves you are going to surf, and slap the fin set up on it that suits you - for me there is no specific four fin or tri fins shapes, but not everyone sees it that way.
JB, good point on fin choices!
I did talk to Baden at SC, which also planted the seed...
Don has a 6'3", which I'm not sure how he likes.
Paul, my biggest board right now is 6'0", and it feels small on many days, particularly as I grow!
I may not go all the way to 6'8", but 6'4"-6'6".
For OBSF, and Churchills, I'm thinking it will be a bit of a setback punching through the shorebreak, but will help in negotiating through the trip out back from there.
I'm thinking the shorter intervals will be a setback for a board that's harder to duck, and where there's less flat water to gain ground.
Take-offs will be interesting... less fin action and more arm action. The length of board hopefully will help getting in earlier.
From there, the length of rail should be great for much-needed drive. There's enough open face that a tight arc really isn't so important.
That said, Baden was doing a heck of a job turning a 6'6" at SC in modest sized waves...
At the end of the day, aren't we supposed to get bigger boards as we age? Also, unlike years past, I know there's a solid used board market out there if things go South!
I did talk to Baden at SC, which also planted the seed...
Don has a 6'3", which I'm not sure how he likes.
Paul, my biggest board right now is 6'0", and it feels small on many days, particularly as I grow!
I may not go all the way to 6'8", but 6'4"-6'6".
For OBSF, and Churchills, I'm thinking it will be a bit of a setback punching through the shorebreak, but will help in negotiating through the trip out back from there.
I'm thinking the shorter intervals will be a setback for a board that's harder to duck, and where there's less flat water to gain ground.
Take-offs will be interesting... less fin action and more arm action. The length of board hopefully will help getting in earlier.
From there, the length of rail should be great for much-needed drive. There's enough open face that a tight arc really isn't so important.
That said, Baden was doing a heck of a job turning a 6'6" at SC in modest sized waves...
At the end of the day, aren't we supposed to get bigger boards as we age? Also, unlike years past, I know there's a solid used board market out there if things go South!