Page 1 of 2

Looking for quad shaper

Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:45 pm
by kneecaps
I just picked up a Romaonski tri-fin, but want to add a quad. I used to have a Fineline quad (I think Brian Hilbers shaped it). It was really light and fast, but squirly. Looking for a tip on a good brand/shaper for a new quad. thanks.

Re: Looking for quad shaper

Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2005 2:05 pm
by Beeline2.0
..

Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2005 5:01 pm
by WayneK
Don't forget the local Dean Cleary and of course Romo! 8)

Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2005 6:29 pm
by W.G. Facenda
I would say Rich Pavel but he told me today he is backed up 300 orders and/or 8-9 months.The fish is alive and well.Blast in hawaii is your best bet in my opinion.

Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2005 7:47 pm
by uriah
8-9 months even if he's not backed up or in Tobyland. Incredible boards though.

Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2005 8:52 pm
by DrStrange
Also Manuel Caro @ Mandala is Pavel protegee. Shapes fish and swallow tail quads

solutions

Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2005 11:05 pm
by hart
go and have a Blast mate..

2 easy uh?

:)

bruce

Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 7:43 am
by SFKneelo
NewpKneelo...
Seeing that you have 2 posts... maybe some introductions are in order...
Hart IS Flashpoint. He's right here for Q&A.
Parkes has a website w/info. Don is US rep.
Bud McCray has a website.
Many here can speak to US shapers.
Poke around, check out board pix, and look in the links section.

You've landed in the kneelo emporium. Your problem now is that you have way too many options and too much information!

Pipe in Jerry McGuire... 'Help me help you... help ME help YOU...'

Excuse me whilst I air-dry... :wink:

Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 12:52 pm
by surfhorn
Can't go wrong with a Freeline. Kept me happy for about 34 years.

Besides, we all know that Santa Cruz County rules and SoCal drools.....

K-58

Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 2:43 pm
by Jack Beresford
You can reach James Mangano/K-58 at 858-525-1937.

Here's a few photos of his boards (the red ones are mine):

album_showpage.php?pic_id=2874

album_showpage.php?pic_id=2777

album_showpage.php?pic_id=2392

I have a couple used ones. If you want to check them out - send me a PM.

Jack

Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 3:51 pm
by john -
Why do want a quad :?:

Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 4:28 pm
by kneecaps
I had no idea this site was here. I've been kneeboarding for a long time. This is great info...much better than riding in the dark all these years. Thanks much.

Why a quad, someone asked. I like the way I can cut from turn to turn easily. Best on big freindly waves. But I like the tri I have now. But it seems like I really can't cut out of the wave in an instance...sort of a sluggish board when I want to turn sharp.

Thanks for the info...I'm thinking I may wait the 8-9 months for the Rich Pavel.

Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 4:29 pm
by kneecaps
...but the romo does stick in the pocket real tight, though...

John

Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 5:07 pm
by albert
One thing I canadvise is to make sure you understand that different shapers will shape diffferent quads and tri's to the point where one shapers tri (or quad) will ride very different to anothers. Fin Placement as well as rail shape and about a 100 different other aspects of the board will make it turn differently in different parts of the wave.

One example. I rode a romo quad once, couldnt turn it to save my life... the pads on it were too thin, but also the fact that I had to put so much effort into making it turn was probably the reason my knees hurt for days afterwords. Shortly thereafter I rode a Parkes quad, and I couldnt control it at all, it was super squirly and all over the place.

The reason I put a quad as an example is to show the perspective of someone that never surfs them.

I would also suggest you read this topic. viewtopic.php?t=606

Also that I have noticed, there are a lot of people that have been blown away with the amount of input people give on this site. (myself included). There are a lot of questions asked, and a lot of differrent opinions that often disagree, but thats what makes this site so great.

Alright, thats enough
albert