two piece bisecting kneeboard

What works & what doesn't and in what type of conditions. Got a "secret" only you and your shaper know???? Post it here... we can keep it quiet ;-)

Moderator: Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
sf_firestarter
Ripper (more than 100 posts)
Ripper (more than 100 posts)
Posts: 253
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 8:46 am
Location: SF,CA,USA

two piece bisecting kneeboard

Post by sf_firestarter »

I'm thinking of a winter project of building a bisecting kneeboard for travel as board fees have just gotten ridiculous.

Has anybody here made an attempt at this? I've never seen a bisecting board in person but see online that a few techniques to achieve this goal are being utilized for longboards.

Any thoughts, guidance, recommendations?
User avatar
Headwax.
Legend (Contribution King!)
Legend (Contribution King!)
Posts: 610
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 2:16 am
Contact:

Post by Headwax. »

I'm sure I read an article in the 70's where this guyhad one...

http://www.surfermag.com/features/feralsurfers/

http://www.surfingvancouverisland.com/surf/st208.htm

not that that helps you sorry
analbirth
Legend (Contribution King!)
Legend (Contribution King!)
Posts: 902
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 11:28 pm
Location: casuarina / kingscliff australia
Contact:

Post by analbirth »

once you've had black you'll never go back!!!
C.P.Odom
Legend (Contribution King!)
Legend (Contribution King!)
Posts: 726
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 5:33 am
Location: San Diego, Vista

Post by C.P.Odom »

I looked up several multi-piece travel boards and each time these ding-dongs bisect the board in the middle, not too smart. A three piece board with the center intact is a much better idea. separate the nose and the tail at least behind the forward fins. Leave the highest stressed areas as one piece.
Never leave well enough alone.
analbirth
Legend (Contribution King!)
Legend (Contribution King!)
Posts: 902
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 11:28 pm
Location: casuarina / kingscliff australia
Contact:

Post by analbirth »

i've seen one like that about 6 months back but couldn't find it again, i'll keep looking
once you've had black you'll never go back!!!
User avatar
K-man
Legend (Contribution King!)
Legend (Contribution King!)
Posts: 1461
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 12:35 pm
Location: north of san francisco

post

Post by K-man »

62'' and under is considered regular luggage.So.....If your KB is 6'(72'')and you have a removable nose (10'')your at regular luggage...no charge...maybe.Seems that may be the most feasible method...and possibly the strongest..if done properly.One of you geniuses out there should be able to pull it off.Even if you lose the nose,it's still rideable.
The issue may be the board bag....Is that a surfboard?No...... :lol:Might have to remake an easy to handle case that could handle two boards...Sounds complicated,but if you trave a bunch...might be worthwhile.

cheers
User avatar
Terence H
Ripper (more than 100 posts)
Ripper (more than 100 posts)
Posts: 115
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 4:03 am
Location: Durban South Africa
Contact:

Walden tri Fold

Post by Terence H »

I have seen that some airlines need the board to be 5 ft and under.
Something along the lines of the Walden Tri Fold might be great.

http://www.surfline.com/surf-news/summe ... ard_57766/

T
Post Reply